W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: questions viz. when fields match element with the ur-type

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Aug 2002 09:16:14 +0100
To: neilg@ca.ibm.com
Cc: w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b65xwra29.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

neilg@ca.ibm.com writes:

> 1.  Is it valid for a <field> to match an element with the ur-type
> definition under any circumstances?

I'd say 'no', because keys are _values_, and only 'real' simple types
have values.  Thanks for bringing this up, because it suggests we
should rule out the simple ur-type here as well.

ht

P.S. Please note the the ig is not public, but the comments list is,
so it's not a good idea to send mail to both at the same time.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 04:16:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:01 GMT