W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 15 Aug 2002 14:39:07 -0500
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1029440347.19176.2450.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 22:35, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I see where you're coming from, Dan, but I suspect the horse has already 
> left the barn on this one.

Well, we agree what the problem/issue is, anyway,
if not now to solve/address it.

Thanks for the response. Please keep me posted on any
relevant decisions the WG makes.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 15:38:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:01 GMT