Mismatch between Part 1 and Part 2

Section 3.14.3[1] of Part 1[2] has a section called Schema Representation
Constraint: Simple Type Restriction (Facets) which purports to define the
interaction between the facets of a derived type and the facets of its base
type. I think this section should be removed as it conflicts with the actual
sections in Part 2[3] that define such interactions;

4.3.1.4[4]
4.3.2.4[5]
4.3.3.4[6]
4.3.4.4[7]
4.3.5.4[8]
4.3.6.4[9]
4.3.7.4[10]
4.3.8.4[11]
4.3.9.4[12]
4.3.10.4[13]
4.3.11.4[14]
4.3.12.4[15]

Regards

Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor

[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#section-(non-normative)-
Constraints-on-XML-Representations-of-Simple-Type-Definitions
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-length
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-minLength
[6] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-maxLength
[7] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-pattern
[8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-enumeration
[9] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-whiteSpace
[10] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-maxInclusive
[11] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-maxExclusive
[12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-minInclusive
[13] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-minExclusive
[14] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-totalDigits
[15] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#rf-fractionDigits

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 11:38:03 UTC