W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: final and derivation by list or union.

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 16 Nov 2001 12:25:32 +0000
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: Ross Thompson <rthompson@contivo.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, KAZUMI Saito <ksaito@jp.fujitsu.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bheruoqbn.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
So I think there's a bug in Schema Component Constraint: Simple Type
Definition Properties Correct.  The following is not what was intended:

  4.2.1 If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {base type
        definition} must not contain list.
  4.2.2 If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of the {base type
        definition} must not contain union.

I think this should have read

  4.2.1 If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {item type
        definition} must not contain list.
  4.2.2 If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of each of the {member type
        definitions} must not contain union.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 07:24:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:57 GMT