W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Potential Erratum Re: clarification on Unique Particle Attribution

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 18:32:38 +0100
To: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bn12h3pvt.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
sandygao@ca.ibm.com writes:

> Oh, so it's "uniquely determine", not "unique particle". 

That's my take, yes.  As I said, the WG will need to decide.

> Sorry for having misunderstood this. But it's hard, isn't it?

Absolutely -- thank you for spotting the way in which what was there
is not complete.

> And I was misled by the appendix, which only talks about non-group
> particles, not how to "uniquely determine" a particle. :-)

As I implied, with hindsight the FSA approach should have been given
more prominence, as it avoids all this terminology confusion.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 13:31:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:57 GMT