- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 24 Oct 2001 18:32:38 +0100
- To: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
sandygao@ca.ibm.com writes:
> Oh, so it's "uniquely determine", not "unique particle".
That's my take, yes. As I said, the WG will need to decide.
> Sorry for having misunderstood this. But it's hard, isn't it?
Absolutely -- thank you for spotting the way in which what was there
is not complete.
> And I was misled by the appendix, which only talks about non-group
> particles, not how to "uniquely determine" a particle. :-)
As I implied, with hindsight the FSA approach should have been given
more prominence, as it avoids all this terminology confusion.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 13:31:56 UTC