W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Potential Erratum Re: clarification on Unique Particle Attribution

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 18:32:38 +0100
To: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bn12h3pvt.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
sandygao@ca.ibm.com writes:

> Oh, so it's "uniquely determine", not "unique particle". 

That's my take, yes.  As I said, the WG will need to decide.

> Sorry for having misunderstood this. But it's hard, isn't it?

Absolutely -- thank you for spotting the way in which what was there
is not complete.

> And I was misled by the appendix, which only talks about non-group
> particles, not how to "uniquely determine" a particle. :-)

As I implied, with hindsight the FSA approach should have been given
more prominence, as it avoids all this terminology confusion.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 13:31:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:57 UTC