W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: another circularity problem

From: Fuchs, Matthew <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:21:39 -0700
Message-ID: <C1E0143CD365A445A4417083BF6F42CC894768@C1plenaexm07.commerceone.com>
To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
We could simply rule out infinite definitions elements or attributes in the
same complex type.

Matthew


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:25 PM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: another circularity problem
> 
> 
> I don't _think_ I can see where circular substition group are ruled
> out -- either I've missed something, or we should add something.
> 
> ht
> -- 
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
> University of Edinburgh
>           W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
> 131 650-4440
> 	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> 		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> 
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 21:19:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:57 GMT