W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: unsignedByte verses unsignedBtype id

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 04 Oct 2001 22:44:05 +0100
To: merks@ca.ibm.com
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, nally@us.ibm.com, frankb@ca.ibm.com
Message-ID: <f5bu1xfjd22.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
merks@ca.ibm.com writes:

<snip/>

> Would it be a violation of the standard to rectify this problem in our
> cached version of the schema for schema.

There will shortly be an official erratum published on this, at which
point the document at http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd will be
corrected.

So, in a word, 'yes'.

ht

[Sorry about the preceding empty reply]
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 17:43:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:57 GMT