W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

FW: Monospaced Font in XML Schema Part 0?

From: Jason Stallion <Jason.Stallion@ilrn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <916C3941A917D411B470009027540659836D3A@test3.test.com>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

Hi,

I have received no response to the following.  I think it's worth pursuing,
because the sentence is actually confusing as it is currently rendered.  The
use of a monospaced font would help to reduce that confusion.  Because the
element in question is named "name", readers may not understand that the
words "element name" refer to the element named name, instead of merely
referring to the "name" property of an element.

Do you agree?

- Jason Stallion


>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Jason Stallion  
> Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:02 PM
> To:	'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'
> Subject:	Monospaced Font in XML Schema Part 0?
> 
> In the following line, taken from XML Schema Part One: A Primer, section
> 2.5.2, the word "name" is an element name, and, like other element names
> in the specification, should be rendered in a monospaced font.  No?
> "Specifically, text appears between the elements salutation, quantity,
> productName and shipDate which are all children of letterBody, and text
> appears around the element name which is the child of a child of
> letterBody."
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 19:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:51 GMT