W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Nillable or nullable?

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 15:05:11 +0100
Message-ID: <005401c106ed$e00b0940$0300a8c0@greyarea>
To: <jjc@incusdata.com>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jacqui Coosner" <jjc@incusdata.com>
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:00 PM
Subject: Nillable or nullable?


> I notice that the new Schema Recommendation uses
> the term "nillable" as an attribute for use on elements
> which are permitted not to have comment. In the 
> previous Candidate Recommendation dated 24 Oct 2000,
> the term used was "nullable" - which is what the tool I 
> use currently supports. 
> Is the new term a conscious change from the earlier
> one, or was one of them a typo?

Conscious change to nillable

Regards

Martin
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2001 10:07:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:51 GMT