W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]

From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:44:07 -0500
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Cc: jjc@jclark.com, w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF05F33106.1192CCB4-ON85256A1C.0066FC8E@lotus.com>
Does it make any sense to do regex's or BNF as non-normative for 1.0, 
normative for 1.1?  This might, editors' time permitting, let us get 
something out, and still have the opportunigy to fix edge cases before we 
make it normative.  I've thought for a long time we need not only a formal 
grammar for the lexical forms, but formal mappings to the value space.  In 
other words, show the polynomial that gives you the integer value, for 

Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 14:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:54 UTC