W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Jan 2001 08:53:10 +0000
To: Philip Wadler <wadler@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b8zoieah5.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Philip Wadler <wadler@research.bell-labs.com> writes:

> In fact, Volker provided details, which I elided.
> Here is the complete entry.  If you need further explanation,
> let me know and I'll ask Volker.  -- P
> 
> - interaction between equivalence classes and import:
> <schema targetNamespace="uri_for_A" xmlns:B="uri_for_B">
>   <import targetNamespace="uri_for_B"/>
>   <element name="start">
>     <complextype>
>       <element ref="B:B1"/>
>     </complextype>
>   </element>
> 
>   <element name="A1" equivClass="B:B1">
>     ...
>   </element >
> </schema>
> 
> <schema targetNamespace="uri_for_B">
>   <element name="B1">
>     ...
>   </element >
> </schema>
> 
> document:
> <A:start xmlns:A="uri_for_A">
>   <A:A1>...</A:A1>
> </A:start>

I don't see any (bad) interaction: those schemas and that document are
just fine, modulo April vs. October syntax.  What's the problem
supposed to be?

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2001 08:42:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:49 GMT