I am more than happy that the Schema WG accepted this suggestion. Thanks, David "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" wrote: > > Dear David: > > The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several months > working through the comments received from the public on the last-call > draft of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments > you made on our specification during our last-call comment period, and > want to make sure you know that all comments received during the > last-call comment period have been recorded in our last-call issues > list (http://www.w3.org/2000/05/12-xmlschema-lcissues). > > Among other issues, you raised the point registered as issue LC-210, > which suggests that the DTD for schemas be made non-normative. > > As you know, after discussion the WG agreed with the proposal, and > the DTD for schemas has in fact been made non-normative in the > most recent versions of XML Schema. > > It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the > decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the > WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of > the W3C. > > with best regards, > > -C. M. Sperberg-McQueen > World Wide Web Consortium > Co-chair, W3C XML Schema WGReceived on Friday, 6 October 2000 00:10:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:48 GMT