- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:37:43 +0100
- To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
<SNIP> > In an earlier message in this thread, you said "it is the value of the targetNamespace attribute > that determines which namespace top level schema components are in (named types, global element > decls, global attribute decls, etc.)" > > When you say "top level", you mean that literally, right, as in ONLY the child elements of the > schema element? [MJG] Yes, when I said 'top-level' I meant constructs that are immediate children of the schema element. > > Does that "etc." represent anything? That is, is there anything else on which the targetNamespace > has an effect? [MJG] Well, model group definitions, attribute group definitions and keys spring to mind. As a general rule, I think anything in the spec which can appear at the top-level *and* be refered to from somewhere else will be in the tns. There may be some exceptions to this, I'd have to check to be absolutely sure. Martin Gudgin
Received on Monday, 14 August 2000 10:41:30 UTC