- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:33:16 -0700
- To: Matthew Fuchs <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>, "'Bill la Forge'" <b.laforge@jxml.com>, Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
- Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3c.org, "Schneider,John C." <jcs@mitre.org>, "Cokus,Michael S." <msc@mitre.org>, "Ripley,Michael W." <rip@mitre.org>
Sorry for the confusion. I intended the concept from the view point of learning to use XML Schemas. I personally would not like to see the parser industry design to a sub-set. I agree that bifurcating the schema world now would be a "bad" thing. As I talk with those who advocating "simpler schemas", I will have to be more careful with my words to make that point clear. Regards, Dave Hollander At 11:48 AM 2/11/00 -0800, Matthew Fuchs wrote: >Standardizing such a thing makes me extremely nervous at this point. The >value of a standard is only that it is standard - xsdl hasn't even been >finalized and we're already talking about bifurcating it. ... __________________________________________________________ Dave Hollander Director eCommerce Knowledge Management and Interoperability CommerceNet Co-chair W3C XML Schema Working Group dmh@commerce.net 970-613-0605 __________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 11 February 2000 18:13:49 UTC