W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 09 Feb 2000 10:35:26 +0000
To: james.anderson@mecomnet.de
Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, www-xml-schema-comments@w3c.org
Message-ID: <f5b3dr2iryp.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
james anderson <james.anderson@mecomnet.de> writes:

>  The concepts of "namespace as collection" and "membership in a
> collection" would appear to be present in the specification. If there
> were to ever be a revised draft, perhaps it would work out their
> implications and thereby avoid such unpleasantries as those in the
> schema proposal for the purpose of identifying "names in no namespace".

I agree this is a misleading phrase: the current working draft no
longer uses it, but speaks only of qualified and unqualified names.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2000 05:35:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT