Hi, I think it would be more intuitive if you could specify an occurence of a class of elements by specifying just the allowed type, like in: <type name="Foo"> ... </type> <element name="bar"> <type> <element type="Foo"/> </type> </element> <element name="foo" type="Foo"/> <element name="baz" type="Foo"/> In this (experimental) example both foo and baz would be allowed as a child to bar. Why do we need equivalence classes to accomplish this? To me they just add an unnecessary level of abstraction. What am I missing? Cheers David Rosenborg OM Technology ABReceived on Wednesday, 19 January 2000 12:10:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT