There's an implication of your approach which I think I want to disagree with, namely that two documents each with no namespace declarations at all ipso facto put their GIs in the SAME, default [your word] namespace. I don't read the namespace REC as allowing this inference. It says they are in no namespace, and I think we should respect that. There's nothing in what I wrote (or I didn't intend there to be) which licenses the inference that by '##noNamespace' I mean to provide a namespace URI for the universal default namespace -- I quite specifically do NOT mean that, but rather to shoehorn into the xsi:schemaLocation syntax a way of saying that the schema which provides constraints for the names in this document which are in no namespace can be found . . . ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 15:57:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT