W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces

From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:53:07 +0100
Message-ID: <38722573.6A2CBC3A@mecomnet.de>
To: XML List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, xml-schema-comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3c.org>
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> We don't yet have a concrete syntax for indicating an association
> between "no namespace" and a schema in xsi:schemaLocation.

Wait. Is this really saying that one is looking for a way to encode the
specification, that a symbol, so encoded as to denote that it is in no
namespace, is really to be taken to be identical with another symbol, so
encoded as to denote that it is in another, definite namespace?
Isn't this impossible by definition?

> need to fill this gap.  The locally-scoped element declaration issue
> doesn't arise in this case, or rather both interpretations give the
> same answer.
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 11:48:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT