Your issue wrt URIs for datatypes and facets

You raised an issue against XML Schema regarding URIs for datatypes
and facets [1].  I replied offering two options [2].  With hindsight,
I missed the facets aspect of your request.  Could you clarify, using
the example of the 'pattern' facet and the 'NCName' datatype, which of
three interpretations we should place on your request:

  1) A name for the 'pattern' facet in general, independent of what
     type it's qualifying;
  2) A name for the 'pattern' facet as used in definitions based on
     the NCName builtin;
  3) A name for the 'pattern' facet in the definition of the NCName
     builtin itself.

Please seek further clarification on IRC if necessary

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0181.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0193.html
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 11:10:13 UTC