3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? from James Tauber on 2000-04-28 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000)

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:18:37 -0400
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72E@mail.bowstreet.com>

Why does "absent" in the "Complex Type Definition of the Ur-Type" tableau
(and possibly elsewhere) point to the definition for "null" in the glossary?

James
--
James Tauber
jtauber@bowstreet.com
Director XML Technology
Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com

Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 04:21:00 UTC