W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration?

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 03:55:45 -0400
Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72B@mail.bowstreet.com>
To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

> Because they don't make sense on top-level declarations.

So, could a sentence be added to this effect?

James

Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 03:58:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration?"
Previous message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration?"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT