W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2000

3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration?

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 02:42:09 -0400
Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72A@mail.bowstreet.com>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>


Why are {min occurs} and {max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration?

The meaning of "absent" for these properties doesn't seem to be defined in
3.2 and I can't think of what it would be.

James
--
James Tauber
jtauber@bowstreet.com
Director XML Technology
Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com

Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 02:44:46 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration?"
Previous message: dejudicibus@it.ibm.com: "Entities"
Next in thread: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration?"
Maybe reply: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:46 GMT