W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: Re; PIs in xml:schema

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 05:39:00 -0500
Message-ID: <378B1744.B0CB457F@prescod.net>
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
David Beech wrote:
> Thanks for the interesting discussion of floating element types.  We
> have recorded this as an issue for XML Schema, although the breadth of
> the implications suggests that we might not be the right WG to take up
> the cudgels for a PI replacement in XML - maybe the XML Syntax WG?

My assertion is that a PI is an element that is 

 a) broken in many ways :)


 b) schema invisible.

Therefore if you describe a mechanism for making elements schema invisible
(or at least invisible to the MAIN schema but perhaps visible to some
other one) then you will have defined a replacement for PIs whether you
meant to or not. The PI syntax will go away naturally over time when
people realize the implications of schema-invisible elements.

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself

Math -- that most logical of sciences -- teaches us that the truth can
be highly counterintuitive and that sense is hardly common.
	K.C.Cole, "The Universe and the Teacup"
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 1999 06:56:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:51 UTC