W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Argh...Entities

From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 19:19:22 +0900
Message-Id: <199905171019.AA00514@archlute.apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Paul Prescod wrote:
> I understand your goal but I think that that is too severe a constraint.

I have been the only opponent.  I am likely to lose.  (; ;)

> The convenience of annotating the tree from the schema is just too large.

I agree with this observation, but my point is that information set 
contribution is ouside the scope of the schema validator.  It should be left 
to application programs.  By doing so, we can make the specification a lot 

Now that schemata are in the XML syntax, they can be parsed by XML processors.  
Thus, application programs can easily obtain additional information from 
schemata.  We only have to allow XML schemata to have user-defined elements, 
which may be used by such application programs.


Fuji Xerox Information Systems
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp
Received on Monday, 17 May 1999 06:19:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:51 UTC