W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-query-comments@w3.org > March 2004

Possible XMLP WG comment to XML Query

From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:04 -0800
To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Cc: w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5E1C82BD.7CB0AD27-ON88256E4D.003299E3-88256E4D.0033469F@us.ibm.com>

XMLP WG will formally consider whether to join with Schema's comment at its
telcon next week (March 10). In the meantime, this email serves as the
heads-up outlined by Noah below.

David Fallside
Chair, XMLP WG

----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 03/04/2004 01:12 AM
             dge/IBM@Lotus                                              To 
             Sent by:                  w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org          
             w3c-xml-protocol-                                          cc 
                                       Report from Henry that Query WG     
             03/03/2004 01:09          Needs DM Input by Thursday          

I note the following from Henry.  We agreed yesterday not to formally weigh
in this until next week, but I wonder whether it would be appropriate for
David as chair to at least give Query an immediate heads up that "There
seems to be considerable sympathy in XMLP for supporting Query's view that
the Data Model should be an Infoset++ with functional accessors if useful.
We need until early next week to make that input formal, but my reading as
chair is that it's at least 50/50 that you will get such input from us."
I hear rumors that the DOM group is considering similar feedback.

Here are links to pertinent notes on the Schema IQ list [1,2,3].


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0008.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0009.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0010.html

Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM on 03/03/2004 04:02 AM
|         |           ht@inf.ed.ac.uk      |
|         |           (Henry S. Thompson)  |
|         |           Sent by:             |
|         |           w3c-xml-schema-ig-req|
|         |           uest@w3.org          |
|         |                                |
|         |                                |
|         |           03/03/2004 03:31 AM  |
|         |                                |


  |       To:       Schema Interest Group <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>
  |       cc:       (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
  |       Subject:  Re: Draft wording on feedback to QT on Data Model and
Infoset                             |


QT have scheduled work on Data Model for this Friday morning --
accordingly it would help them if we sent our pending comment by close
of business tomorrow (Thursday).  So if anyone is not happy with what
I sent, _please_ signal this ASAP, alternatively if you think it's OK
to send it Thursday, please signal that also.

 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged

(image/gif attachment: pic04423.gif)

(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 04:22:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:16 UTC