W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-query-comments@w3.org > February 2002

Re: XQuery lexical stuff

From: <scott_boag@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 05:08:07 -0500
To: Michael Dyck <MichaelDyck@shaw.ca>
Cc: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF61DDFA02.6638060C-ON85256B6B.0036392B@lotus.com>
Hi Michael.  I just wanted to thank you for your comments on the XQuery
lexical section
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2002Jan/0002.html).

 I've been ill the last couple of months and haven't had a chance to reply.

I will be working on the lexical section over the coming weeks, and will
keep your comments well in mind.

I am confused by your CFG replacement for the lexical states.  While
there's no question it would be nice to get rid of lexical state
recognition, I'm still not sure how you CFG fixes things with the
tokenizer.  For instance, isn't EndTagClose still ambiguious against Gt?

In any case, I just wanted you to know that your note hadn't been missed or
dismissed by the WGs.  I may be in touch with you with more follow up
questions.

-scott
Received on Monday, 25 February 2002 15:46:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:15 UTC