- From: Jerome Simeon <simeon@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: 03 Apr 2002 11:53:37 -0500
- To: phenix_shieh@hotmail.com
- Cc: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>, XQuery Comments List <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>
Phenix, Yes sorry this is a bit confusing. Most of the grammar rules in the main body actually correspond to grammar productions for the full XQuery syntax. So [34] corresponds to the number in the XQuery document. Other grammar rules (in the Core Grammar sub-sections and in the Appendix) are the numbers for the Core grammar productions. I think we should find a way to differentiate those in the future. Thank you for your interest in our work, - Jerome Jerome Simeon - Bell Laboratories --- Lucent Technologies 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ, USA Tel: +1 908 582 5473 Fax: +1 908 582 7308 > -----Original Message----- > From: Phenix Shieh [mailto:phenix_shieh@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:29 AM > To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org > Subject: What's wrong with this? > > In the 26th,Mar.,W3C's XQuery FS document,Appendix:A Normalized core > grammar,i found that the id of a production doesnot compatible with the id > of the same production in the main body. > For example,you may find(in 4.3.1): > [34] AxisStep::=Axis NodeTest > ^^^^ > but in the Appendix Core Grammar,the same production is labled as this: > [19] AxisStep::=Axis NodeTest > ^^^^ > What's wrong with the number?Does there exists a newer version of the core? > thx. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > 享用世界上最大的 Web 电子邮件系统 ―― MSN Hotmail。 > http://www.hotmail.com/cn
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 11:56:22 UTC