W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-query-comments@w3.org > June 2001

Re: XML Query: lexical analysis

From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:16:21 +0200
Message-ID: <3B2F2672.D422ADD5@setf.de>
To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org, MichaelDyck@home.com

my reading of the new spec left me in a similar quandry. the earlier
version permitted a context free lexical analysis. that was nice. the
newer one precludes that. 

at first i wondered why one would make such a qualitative chage without
a mention, but then i reflected on the general tendancy away from the
original syntax, which had adopted many nice, simple, clear, easy to
read features from the algebra syntax, towards a syntax which offers the
convenience of literal xml forms. this realization made every thing clear.

so just resigned myself to incorporating a context-dependent lexical
analyser of the same order as a full-blown xml-parser requires. in my
case, the parser itself permits multiple categories, so it's not too bad.

who am i to say...

> From: Michael Dyck (MichaelDyck@home.com)
> Date: Sun, Jun 17 2001
> 
 ...

> 
> What is a would-be tokenizer to do? It seems that lexical analysis of XQuery
> requires contextual feedback from the parser, which must be running in
> parallel. This is an unwelcome complication, and one that is not supported
> by all parsing software.
> 
> -Michael Dyck
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 06:12:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 February 2007 00:13:02 GMT