Jonathan Robie wrote: > This is a response to the following messages, which you posted to the XML > Query Working Group's comments list: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0016.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0019.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0020.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0026.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0027.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0028.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0029.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0030.html There's also these, which I believe have not had a response yet: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0000.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0013.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0048.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0049.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0023.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0030.html Maybe the latter 4 were submitted too late for this publication cycle (although really, an April 29th submission is too late for a June 8th publication?), but the first two certainly weren't. -Michael DyckReceived on Friday, 15 June 2001 02:25:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 February 2007 00:13:02 GMT