Re: XML Base PER--Missing definition of URI reference

Paul,

Thank you. We were confused by this, but we can live with your reply.

Bets wishes,

Steven Pemberton
For the XHTML2 WG


On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:31:27 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your comments at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/
> 0011
> on the XML Base Second Edition PER.
>
> Regarding:
>
>> In the list of changes it states "The definition of
>> URI reference has been switched from RFC2396 to 3986",
>> but we couldn't locate that definition.  Presumably it
>> should be in section 2.
>
>
> The XML Core WG has reviewed this comment and decided not
> to make any change to XML Base Second Edition with the
> following explanation:
>
> That mention in the list of changes refers to the fact
> that we have changed references to RFC2396 (where the
> term URI reference was defined) to references to RFC 3986
> (which is the current location of the definition of the
> term URI reference).  The XML Base spec does not define
> the term URI reference; the change was merely to update
> to point to the latest location of the defintion.
>
> See also
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/
> 0000
> for previous reponses.
>
>
> We hope to transition XML Base to Recommendation within
> the next few weeks.  Please let us know if you accept
> our disposition of this comment as soon as feasible.
> If we have not heard by September 22, we will assume
> you have no objection to our resolution.
>
> Paul Grosso
> for the XML Core WG