W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:01:17 +0000 (GMT)
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060125230117.EDE1E5938AF@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> It's b), http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005May/0022.html
> would not make sense otherwise, e.g.

It doesn't really make sense:

> | The original character encoding is part of the Infoset. See point 6 at
> | http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#infoitem.document.

That's just the encoding of the document entity.  It is not necessarily
the original encoding of any particular character that you find in
the document.  The infoset does not maintain that information.

-- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 23:01:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:46 GMT