W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:43:39 -0500
To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <878xtmkbx0.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> was heard to say:
| Quoting Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>:
|> This link does not conform to XLink:
|>  <someElement xlink:type="foobar">foo</someElement>
| Your proposed text seems reanonable, but does it cover the slightly more
| complicated case of:
| <someElement xlink:href="test" xlink:type="bogus">foo</someElement>

Per 3.2, that doesn't conform to XLink.

| ...? Especially now xlink:type is more or less optional. And what
| should happen
| with:
| <someElement xlink:href="test" xlink:bogus="foo">foo</someElement>

Ah. Yes, given what we say now in Section 4, I think we need a new item
in 3.2:

  3. It does not have any attributes in the XLink namespace other than
     type, href, role, arcrole, title, show, actuate, label, from, and to.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 15:46:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:25 UTC