W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS

From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:57:02 +0200
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: daniel@veillard.com, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050709105702.GU29991@daniel.veillard.com>

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >In general is sounds unwise to try to add to XLink behaviour expectations
> >about all the upper layers which may interract with XLink defined linking
> >constructs. The level of recognition an processing applied by other layers
> >can't be put within XLink, it would make XLink conflict with the specification
> >of those application layers or the evolution of them over time.
> 
> If someone implements a XML 1.0 + CSS + XLink 1.1 user agent there are
> basically just three specifications that can define the rules here. If
> it's a bad idea to make such a user agent, this needs to be clear from
> XLink 1.1, if not there need to be clear processing rules. How the XML
> Core Working Group achieves this is of less concern to me.

  Then you have your answer, CSS says "link" and XLink-1.1 defines links,
so :link applies to links defined by XLink-1.1 constructs. That's my answer
not the XML Core WG one.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | 
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 10:57:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:45 GMT