XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:06:17 +0200 To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org Message-ID: <42fe8576.62470906@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:45 GMT

Dear XML Core Working Group,

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ section 3 and 3.3 are
contradictory with respect to the keywords "optional" and "should, the
latter section refers to "should" as indicating "optional" features,
this is incorrect usage of RFC 2119 terminology, please change the
document such that it complies with the requirements in RFC 2119.

regards,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 