W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: [xml-dev] Unclear point in XML Base

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:04:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200209271416.KAA23166@mail2.reutershealth.com>
To: elharo@metalab.unc.edu (Elliotte Rusty Harold)
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xom-interest@lists.ibiblio.org

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> 2. the base URI of the element's parent element within the document 
> or external entity, if one exists, otherwise


> Clearly, point 2 applies. Unfortunately the English is unclear. Does it mean:
> A. the base URI of the element's parent element within the *same* 
> entity, whether that entity is a document entity or external entity
> B. the base URI of the element's parent element whether the element 
> comes from the document entity or an external entity

I think clearly A is meant, otherwise there would be no point in mentioning
entities at all in point 2.  A clearer wording would be "document entity or
external entity" rather than "document or external entity".

See .sig below for a terse explication of this kind of reasoning.

John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
"The exception proves the rule."  Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory."  Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts
the rule to the proof."  But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 10:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:24 UTC