W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

[Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>] Re: [xml-dev] XPointer and XML Schema

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Jul 2002 17:23:24 +0100
To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bit3e8gsj.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
So Eric's reply went wrong as well, :-(


attached mail follows:



On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 17:57, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@hotmail.com> writes:

> > If XPointer is going to depend on XML Schema, it should do so in a
> > well-specified way.
> 
> It doesn't, and the WG thought its non-dependency was already
> well-specified by the phrase above.  

Isn't it necessary to introduce a XPointer scheme to identify the (or a)
schema(s) which should be used to evaluate the bare names then? It's
done to declare namespaces, why couldn't it be done to declare the
schemas? Although it wouldn't be concise it would be fully
"deterministic"!

Eric
-- 
See you in San Diego.
                               http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------






-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 12:24:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:44 GMT