At 03:50 PM 12/29/00 +0700, James Clark wrote: >A comment in the DTD says: > > <!-- The title element has meaning in resource --> > >but this doesn't correspond to what the DTD says, nor to 4.2, 5.1.1 or >5.1.4. > >What the comment says seems like it ought to be the case. This is a great catch. At one point, resource-type elements didn't have title information because it was assumed that the resource contents themselves were the most appropriate title information. I think the spec got caught between two states. I'm not sure exactly which way we'll resolve it, but I suspect we'll allow title elements. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ east.sun.comReceived on Tuesday, 2 January 2001 13:30:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT