I find the 'minority opinion' piece objectionable because it makes several clearly false claims, as well as including several proposals and pleas rather than limiting itself to expressing opinion or position. I thus believe it is necessary for the WG to issue a majority rationale statement, lest inaccurate and misleading statements be accepted for lack of less partisan information. -- Steven_DeRose@Brown.edu; http://www.stg.brown.edu/~sjd Chief Scientist, Brown Univ. Scholarly Technology Group Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer ScienceReceived on Saturday, 5 May 2001 03:19:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:42 GMT