W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Xpointer Questions

From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:51:48 +0200
To: Mark Polman <polman@few.eur.nl>
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010501185148.S32747@imag.fr>
  Hi Mark,

 The XML Linking Working Group reviewed your comments [1] on the 
XPointer second Last Call working draft [2]. They were added to
the Issue List as Issue XP109 [3].
 The Disposition of Comment for XPointer Second Last Call list [4]
them (Issue (editorial-pollman) in 2.1 and Issue (axis-pollman) in
2.3):
    - the first part of your comment resulted in the decision to
      rewrite the section 5.3.4 to clarify the pointb raised, the
      new wording is available from the Issue List [3].
    - in the second question, yes this part was lacking some
      precision, we will rewrite this part too and provide a
      graphic to explain "visually" the relationship beween sibling
      points.
    - considering the third part, the the "following" and "preceding"
      axes were missing as you pointed out, they will be defined as
      empty in the final version
    - the last part of your comment was considered editorial and
      accepted

  thanks for your feedback, we would appreciate if you could express
if the resolution of those issues fits your expectations.

Daniel

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0073.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/
[3] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html#XP109
[4] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-LC2-comments.html


-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 12:52:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:42 GMT