Re: Your comments on XLink CR

Having personally submitted the comments and then implemented the changes 
:-), I'm satisfied.  If there's anyone else on the TF who is *not* 
satisfied, please speak up by the end of this week.

         Eve

At 11:40 AM 12/12/00 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>In order to formally close the loop to request PR, it would be
>nice if you could review the XLink CR Disposition of Comments
>items concerning the point raised by the Task Force:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xlink-CR-comments.html#N529
>
>I think the XML Linking WG tried to comply as much as possible,
>i.e. 2 items were accepted and the two other ones were postponed
>for a later revision.
>Could you indicate if you accept the Working Group decision on
>those issues ?
>
>   thanks in advance,
>
>Daniel
>
>P.S.: what is blocking the publication of the "XML Linking and Style"
>       NOTE ? Do you think you will get the resources to get this out
>       beginning of January (or earlier ?)
>
>--
>Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
>Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
>Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
>  http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | http://rpmfind.net/

--
Eve Maler                                          +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center    eve.maler @ east.sun.com

Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 09:24:43 UTC