Re: XPointer here() function

"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>It means the XPointer that contains the here() function...  Does this need 
>>further explanation?
>
>Well, it certainly confused me... perhaps because the previous sentence 
>also speaks of containment, in the sense of "the node that directly 
>contains the XPointer". That is probably what threw me off track.

Oh, I see.  We use "containment" in both technical and normal senses
to mean two different things.  Okay, I'll add an editorial issue on this.

>I have found the here() section unclear, but that could just be me. I do 
>think that the spec would benefit from examples in the here() and origin() 
>sections though.

Examples??  You want *examples*??  How unreasonable! :-)  I'll add this
to the same issue.

	Eve