- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:00:48 +0200
- To: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
- Cc: "'www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 02:56:46PM +0100, Kay Michael wrote: > 12. Section 5.4.3 fourth paragraph. "the expression fails" - is this concept > defined? It's in 5.4.2 actually ... This would be taken as an XPath function evaluation failure, and at the XPath level be considered a sub resource error as defined at http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xptr-20000607.html#dt-sub-rsc-err We intend to remove the ambiguity by changing: "of the document, the expression fails." by "of the document, this generates a sub-resource-error" > 13. Section 5.4.3, function start-point(), fourth bullet. Suggesting this is > a syntax error implies that it can be detected statically. This is not the > case, for example start-point((*|@*)[5]): the argument may be an element or > an attribute node. Same comment applies to end-point(). similarily since in most case this cannot be detected statically, we intent to change this and indicate in the last cases for both start-point() and end-point() must generate a sub-resource-error. Do you agree with those modifications ? Daniel -- Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | Today's Bookmarks : Tel : +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux XML libxml WWW Fax : +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Gnome rpm2html rpmfind http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org | RPM badminton Kaffe
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2000 18:01:27 UTC