W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Dependency of XPointers upon DTD

From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:22:18 +0200
Message-ID: <39B893AA.7F026ED9@dyomedea.com>
To: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
CC: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Eve,

I realize, reading your answer, that I should probably have submitted
the 2 points I have mentioned in 2 separate emails since one is IMHO,
more important than the other one and I think I'd better follow up in 2
different threads.

Just a comment about :

"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
> At 04:00 PM 9/1/00 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> >There is another more pernicious usage of DTDs.
> 
> I'm not sure "pernicious" is a fair word to use...  In what sense is the
> usage "high injurious or destructive"?  (www.m-w.com)

I have been misguided by the word "pernicieux" in French which is not so
strong, sorry for this unfortunate choice !

Eric
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 03:21:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:41 GMT