W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: xlink ebnf|dtd

From: Eve L. Maler <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 10:33:47 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000801103201.00c5fe20@abnaki.East.Sun.Com>
To: s-champ@pacbell.net
Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
At 12:42 PM 7/30/00 -0700, S. Champ wrote:
>wondering if it would be possible for the  [ ebnf notation | dtd? ] of the
>current xlink TR to be put written into the HTML version of the TR.

There is no normative DTD (or EBNF notation) for XLink; suggestive 
non-normative DTD snippets are shown throughout.  Because it uses an 
attribute-based structure, and because (for example) any XLink element is 
potentially allowable in any other XLink element (even though it may not 
have any XLink-dictated meaning), I think a normative DTD would be so loose 
as to be pretty much worthless.

         Eve
--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center    elm @ east.sun.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2000 10:32:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:39:40 GMT