- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 13:45:35 -0800
- To: "'www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
Right now "xpointer(...)xpointer(...)" is legal, but xpointer(...)
xpointer(...) is not, while the second may be more readable in some
contexts, e.g.
<href>foo.xml#xpointer(...)
xpointer(...)</href>
Should optional whitespace be allowed between schemes?
Not a big deal, but it seems strange that whitespace is allowed within the
parens, but not between schemes.
<href>foo.xml#xpointer(...
)xpointer(...)</href>
Is legal, but the top example currently isn't.
Received on Friday, 10 December 1999 17:51:20 UTC