W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > October to December 1999

whitespace between schemes

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 13:45:35 -0800
Message-ID: <5F68209F7E4BD111A5F500805FFE35B90E60D8DC@RED-MSG-54>
To: "'www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
Right now "xpointer(...)xpointer(...)" is legal, but xpointer(...)
xpointer(...) is not, while the second may be more readable in some
contexts, e.g.


Should optional whitespace be allowed between schemes?  

Not a big deal, but it seems strange that whitespace is allowed within the
parens, but not between schemes.


Is legal, but the top example currently isn't.
Received on Friday, 10 December 1999 17:51:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:21 UTC