Re: XML Infoset Comment Resolution: issue-dom-{1,2,3}

Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> As of today, the XML Core WG has not received any response from you with
> regard to our Disposition of Comments [1]. I just want to remind you
> that if we have no response by March 24th, we will assume you have no
> objection to our advancing to CR.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Paul Grosso, Arnaud Le Hors
> XML Core WG Co-chairs
> 
> [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/03/infoset-disposition

While the DOM WG is not requesting the XML Core WG to withdraw the
changes made to the latest XML Infoset spec, we'd like to record our
disappointment regarding the removal of CDATA markers and entities
markers. The DOM Working Group has had to make expectations regarding
the XML Infoset since 1997. Since then the XML Infoset has gone
through several changes that have made it different from what we
expected.

Because we can still use the XML Infoset as it stands to describe the
data model used in the DOM, the DOM WG does not object to move the XML
Infoset specification to Candidate Recommendation.

We will try to make the DOM Level 3 Core as compatible as possible with
the XML Infoset.

Regards,
Philippe
DOM WG chair