- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:24:13 -0000
- To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org>
I think the character model document[1] section 3.6.1 provides some guidance. It says avoid 'charset' and use 'character encoding' or 'character encoding scheme'. However, it also says that if you are referring to IANA-registered values you *can* use 'charset', so no help there at all really :-) I think I'd go for 'character encoding' personally... Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-charmod-20010126/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> To: <www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:52 PM Subject: [charset] property > Should the [charset] property be renamed? It is an abbreviation that > seems inconsistent with the naming of other properties. Perhaps > [character set] or [encoding] (which would match the name of the > XML feature). > > -- Richard
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2001 11:25:16 UTC