W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220

From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:21:34 GMT
Message-Id: <28664.200101031521@mcpherson.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
To: james.anderson@attglobal.net
Cc: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org, w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> 1. why don't attributes have a parent?

They have an [owner element] instead.  This corresponds to attributes
not being considered [children] of their elements.

> 2. why are expanded entity references replaced by their string
> equivalent and then marked with start and end markers?

Presumably you mean whay do we do it that way rather than having
entity information items containing the content.

The idea is that the 90% case is to access documents with all the
entities expanded.  It should be *possible* to reconstruct the
entity structure, but it must be *easy* to access the logical structure.

Both these issues are discussed in the XPointer - Infoset liaison
statement, http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xptr-infoset-liaison.

-- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 10:21:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 19 May 2005 09:46:42 GMT