Hello Amol, the XML Security Working Group is chartered to work on a new version of Canonical XML: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/ I've forwarded your message to that working group. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2008-08-14 20:14:06 +0100, Amol Patil wrote: > From: Amol Patil <amolspatil@gmail.com> > To: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0100 > Subject: xml canonicalization - proposition - elimination of element name from end tag > List-Id: <www-xml-canonicalization-comments.w3.org> > X-Spam-Level: > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9744f7ad0808141214w680af2dcsb443c034d57d48e3@mail.gmail.com> > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6 > > Can xml canonicalization further be extended to eliminate the need of the > name of the element in end tag / make it optional? > > Objective here is to reduce the size of overall xml content > > E.g. > <RootElement> > <FirstChildElement> > <FirstChildOfFirstChildElement></> > <SecondChildOfFirstChildElement></> > </> > <SecondChildElement></> > </> > > There is a slight loss of readability here at the gain of reduced content > size. > > ThanksReceived on Friday, 15 August 2008 11:39:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 August 2008 11:39:09 GMT