W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org > August 2008

Re: xml canonicalization - proposition - elimination of element name from end tag

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:35:36 +0200
To: Amol Patil <amolspatil@gmail.com>
Cc: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080815113536.GI383@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

Hello Amol,

the XML Security Working Group is chartered to work on a new version
of Canonical XML:

  http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/

I've forwarded your message to that working group.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>





On 2008-08-14 20:14:06 +0100, Amol Patil wrote:
> From: Amol Patil <amolspatil@gmail.com>
> To: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0100
> Subject: xml canonicalization - proposition - elimination of element name from end tag
> List-Id: <www-xml-canonicalization-comments.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9744f7ad0808141214w680af2dcsb443c034d57d48e3@mail.gmail.com>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
> Can xml canonicalization further be extended to eliminate the need of the
> name of the element in end tag / make it optional?
> 
> Objective here is to reduce the size of overall xml content
> 
> E.g.
> <RootElement>
> <FirstChildElement>
> <FirstChildOfFirstChildElement></>
> <SecondChildOfFirstChildElement></>
> </>
> <SecondChildElement></>
> </>
> 
> There is a slight loss of readability here at the gain of reduced content
> size.
> 
> Thanks
Received on Friday, 15 August 2008 11:39:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 August 2008 11:39:09 GMT