W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:36:59 +0100
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org, www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b1xvjozno.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Namespaces are not about disambiguating the semantics of names, just
names as such and their ownership.  The fact that given a name in a
namespace per XML Namespaces 1.0 you can't even tell whether it names
an element, and attribute, an ID or all three already makes that
clear.

This is not a bug, it's a feature -- as Michael Kay says,
interpretation is always context-bound, that's in the nature of names.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 09:43:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 12:11:47 GMT